Transition from tests3.rs to test3.rs is confusing

[cincodenada]

So I was going through rustlings (which has been great, thanks!) and as it happens, the next unit after tests3.rs is test3.rs in the root. It took me some hard staring to figure out why the code didn't look like I expected it to before I noticed the one-character difference in the filenames.

I'm not sure what the best solution here is - perhaps test*.rs in the root directory could be renamed to quiz*.rs, since that also describes what they are, and that doesn't collide with a concept being taught?

[jrvidal]

I too have thought about this. Maybe tests<X>.rs could be renamed to testing<X>.rs?

[shadows-withal]

Maybe something like test-yourself<X>?

[ScarboroughCoral]

Oh, I am confused too.I think it's necessary to rename it.

[sanjaykdragon]

Maybe something like test-yourself<X>?

Yeah I think this is a better name

[jrial]

My $0.02: renaming to "quiz" is the best suggestion I read in this thread so far. If the idea is to avoid confusion with the previous "test" file, it makes little sense to keep "test" in the name.

[tonyito]

Does anyone know of the status of this issue? Still says test 1-4, when 'quiz' would be the perfect alternative as @jrial said.

[shadows-withal]

I think it's a good idea, and if someone doesn't snipe it from me, I'll do it as soon as I can.

[sanjaykdragon]

sniped @fmoko
#402