feat: zerolog based rolling log system

[dudong2]

Description

Currently, log level setting by module and rotation log system are not available in lbm-sdk's log system. In order to support these functions, a zerolog-based extended log system is implemented.

Closes: #825

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #535 (4f0af64) into main (e8f0b19) will increase coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 82.55%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #535      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.03%   66.14%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         279      280       +1     
  Lines       38045    38119      +74     
==========================================
+ Hits        25122    25213      +91     
+ Misses      11123    11107      -16     
+ Partials     1800     1799       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
config/toml.go	74.19% <ø> (ø)
libs/log/zerolog_logger.go	77.94% <77.94%> (ø)
cmd/ostracon/commands/root.go	37.50% <100.00%> (ø)
config/config.go	78.36% <100.00%> (+0.26%)	⬆️
libs/log/log_level.go	84.21% <100.00%> (ø)
abci/client/socket_client.go	72.09% <0.00%> (-0.88%)	⬇️
p2p/pex/addrbook.go	71.06% <0.00%> (-0.51%)	⬇️
consensus/reactor.go	74.75% <0.00%> (-0.36%)	⬇️
proxy/multi_app_conn.go	47.66% <0.00%> (ø)
blockchain/v0/pool.go	79.06% <0.00%> (+0.25%)	⬆️
... and 5 more

[Kynea0b]

Thanks for the PR. e2e and r2ishiguro require several tests to succeed, so please retry. @dudong2

[dudong2]

Thanks for the PR. e2e and r2ishiguro require several tests to succeed, so please retry. @dudong2

After 7 retries, it passed. The e2e-test has a very frequent failure rate. There were no cases of failure on my local. Do you know why there are so many failures? If it is opened to external developers in the future, is there any plan to revise this test?

[Kynea0b]

LGTM

[tnasu]

After 7 retries, it passed. The e2e-test has a very frequent failure rate. There were no cases of failure on my local. Do you know why there are so many failures? If it is opened to external developers in the future, is there any plan to revise this test?

This PR reduced the failure rate. Thanks

• Backport e2e-test of the latest tendermint main branch #536